Decades-Old Cancer Lie Finally Exposed?
We’re always being told to trust the science…
If scientists studied it, and it was published in a journal, then it must be true.
But here’s what they don’t tell you…
Corporations are often behind the scenes, pulling the puppet strings on this science that we’re supposed to trust.
And that can leave countless people just like you right in harm’s way.
Case in point?
Twenty-six years ago, a study claimed a common household chemical that’s been repeatedly linked to cancer – a chemical that might be sitting in your garage right now – was perfectly safe.
The study was cited thousands of times, and was meant to keep millions of Americans buying the product.
Now, the same journal that published the study is pulling the plug – and making shocking allegations about who was really behind it.
And you deserve the hear the truth – because it could go a long way toward keeping you and your family safe.
I’ve been warning you about the weedkiller glyphosate (often sold as Roundup) for years.
And with good reason…
It’s been repeatedly linked to cancer in animal studies. In fact, when researchers pooled together 21 different mouse studies, they found a clear trend of glyphosate increasing risks of kidney tumors, skin cancer, and more.
The World Health Organization even declared that there was “sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity” for glyphosate in experimental animals.
Of course, for 26 years we were told this couldn’t possibly be true…
You see, back in 2000, a study published in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology declared that glyphosate was harmless. That research has been cited repeatedly – in fact, one analysis found that it was in the top 0.1% of studies cited in glyphosate research.
Well, that study was just retracted by the journal over “serious ethical concerns” about the influence of glyphosate manufacturer Monsanto.
Questions are now being raised about whether Monsanto employees secretly ghostwrote sections of the paper and made undisclosed payments to the researchers.
And the study authors allegedly relied solely on favorable, unpublished research from Monsanto when putting their paper together.
Now, it seems to me that none of these shenanigans would be necessary if you truly believed an honest assessment of your product would yield positive results.
So what exactly was Monsanto worried about? I think we can guess…
Naomi Oreskes, a historian of science at Harvard, sought the retraction and hopes “the word will get out” that the study shouldn’t be trusted anymore. But she’s worried that researchers will continue to cite it.
And she’s probably right. Because the wheel of justice turns awfully slowly in the scientific community – especially when it has to admit it was wrong.
Your best bet is always to look out for yourself.
If you’ve been reading my eletter for a while, I hope you got glyphosate out of your life a long time ago. Keep it out of your home, and stick to organic produce as much as possible.
Because the research about glyphosate’s potential harms is alarming. And the research claiming it was safe is looking pretty frightening, too.
View Sources
Portier, C. J. (2020). A comprehensive analysis of the animal carcinogenicity data for glyphosate from chronic exposure rodent carcinogenicity studies. Environmental Health, 19(1), Article 18. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12940-020-00574-1
Science.org Staff. (2025, December 5). Journal retracts weed killer study backed by Monsanto, citing serious ethical concerns. Science. https://www.science.org/content/article/journal-retracts-weed-killer-study-backed-monsanto-citing-serious-ethical-concerns
Washington Post. (2025, December 5). This study found this weed-killing chemical doesn’t cause cancer. It was just retracted. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2025/12/05/glyphosate-roundup-cancer-bayer-study/
Williams, G. M., Kroes, R., & Munro, I. C. (2000). Safety evaluation and risk assessment of the herbicide Roundup and its active ingredient, glyphosate, for humans [Retraction published 2025]. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230099913715
